The Party’s Party
On July 1, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) threw itself a big birthday bash to celebrate 100 years. In case you missed out on some of the coverage of the event, here is a roundup of some of the more interesting stories.
On July 1, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) threw itself a big birthday bash to celebrate 100 years. In case you missed out on some of the coverage of the event, here is a roundup of some of the more interesting stories.
Christianity faces adversities in China. But God has used some of those unfavorable conditions to accelerate church growth. Thistles and thorns are not the only plants on the path of evangelism. We have simply ignored the little daisies growing along the way.
History has convinced me that God cares about China in his missional plan. This anniversary carries spiritual meaning when we see that the Chinese church has witnessed God’s protection and guidance over the past 100 years.
We must remember that the way the Party views itself is critical to how it interacts with its own populace, particularly to people belonging to faith communities rooted in belief systems beyond Marxist-Leninism. Most of all, we must remember we serve the Lord of Lords who will put all powers in their place before his feet.
Western narratives about China and its church are built on a fundamental, but often unspoken, assumption about the relationship between law and society.
“The China we once knew no longer exists. The China that was with us for forty years—the China of ‘reform and opening up’—is making way for something new.”
Being aware of this year's sensitive anniversaries will be helpful in understanding events in China as they unfold.
Is Christianity being singled out for pressure, harassment, and restriction. Or is part of something bigger?
Understanding the role of the CCP in Chinese society and how it functions is crucial. Here are resources to help.
The State Administration of Religious Affairs (SARA) will be absorbed by the Party’s United Front Work Department.
How is the Chinese government using cutting technology in their efforts to maintain social control?
Our assumptions drive our conclusions about the motivation behind government policies. But are they correct? Do we have any way of confirming or refuting them? Do we really know what is going on?